Which type of male is worse: the type that charms you with sweet promises and little nothings or the type that makes no pretenses and goes straight for your pants?
Obviously these are not the only two choices available to women. There are "good" men who are neither and will be "good" mates, boyfriends and husbands (not necessarily perfect, but good enough).
But between the two types of men above, which is worse?
The charmer - he makes you feel good with his innocence, his wit and his boyish Hugh Grant-ish smile. His smile lights up the room and you wish that he would talk forever just so that you can listen to his voice. Falling for him is easy, but ultimately very dangerous because loving him is a full, heart-given exercise. A risk you're willing to take? Are you willing to risk a shattered heart?
The stud - his raw attractiveness is irresistable, his power, his complete machoismo. He wants you sexually and makes no excuses for it. You know that once you have him, and he has you, it probably won't last. You know this, but he is just so darned irresistable and having him is so wonderful, his leaving will hurt nonetheless.
Leave a comment